Im Pregnant Again After Miscarriage After 2 Years

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just equally disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors evidently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth virtually vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double bank check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their start or 2d trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their brownie.

In other words, this written report was almost certainly a camouflage to effort to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the written report data really show quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a full of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their get-go vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You accept to read the fine impress below the table to encounter this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies striking the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the outset xx weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or 2d trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the 3rd trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have mayhap occurred in women vaccinated during their 3rd trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their get-go or 2d trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her 3rd trimester to take a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the kickoff xx weeks (and pregnant women aren't fourth dimension travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to arrive appear that vaccines are safe for meaning women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than four out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this information set. (It'south a small set of 127 pregnant women, then we'd like to run across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to become a more than clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A uncomplicated mode to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a handbag of fifty lemons and 50 limes, with a scientific discipline study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and reach the number l. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total slice of fruit, and so they declare, "fifty% of lemons are yellow" because it's l/100.

Just the other 50 pieces of fruit tin can't maybe be included considering they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct answer.

In this scientific discipline newspaper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long by the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" tin can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't get back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either can't practise this bones math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and so "science" has already failed its core hope: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world effectually us.

Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first xx weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion charge per unit is simply 12.6%. Why? Because they're roofing upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, nigh likely.

In fact, the fundamental author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same mistake in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, hither's another written report he co-authored: "Agin events afterwards Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Outcome Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did non identify any new or unexpected safety concerns afterwards TIV-ID."

Simply is that decision based on bad math, like the report on covid vaccines given to significant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same report architect has made the aforementioned systematic mistake (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first fourth dimension one author was establish to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't simply have bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it's clear that 4 out of v pregnancies are existence terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at to the lowest degree, according to the small information prepare nosotros have and then far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Retrieve: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly set on reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in significant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of ii medical journals. Although he does not narrate this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You lot can hear him in his ain words in the post-obit interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet by three.ii one thousand thousand over the side by side twelvemonth, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the start xx weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being chosen a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and scientific discipline have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, centre attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the homo race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's state direction czar one time characterized human children as an "environmental hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire homo race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to exist motivated past a desire to assistance humanity, but are now conspicuously shown to be working towards humanity'due south destruction.

Learn more in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

mathiswhem1944.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post